Deterioration degree determination device for secondary battery

ABSTRACT

In a deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery, a battery information acquisition unit acquires battery information related to the secondary battery, and a feasibility determination unit determines feasibility of determination of deterioration degree for each secondary battery based on the battery information and a feasibility determination reference prepared in advance. A battery characteristic acquisition unit acquires a battery characteristic related to transition of a battery state in a predetermined voltage section for the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible by the feasibility determination unit. A deterioration degree determination unit determines the deterioration degree of the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit or a battery characteristic relationship value calculated based on the battery characteristic.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation application of International Pat. Application No. PCT/JP2021/022681 filed on Jun. 15, 2021, which designated the U.S. and claims the benefit of priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-113170 filed on Jun. 30, 2020. The entire disclosures of all of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to a deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery.

BACKGROUND

Conventionally, a battery pack formed by combining multiple secondary batteries has been widely used. The secondary battery deteriorates with the use of the battery pack, but the deterioration degree varies for each secondary battery. Therefore, although the deterioration degree of some of the secondary batteries in the battery pack exceeds a reference, the battery pack as a whole cannot be used. In such a case, the usable secondary battery having a low deterioration degree is taken out from the corresponding battery pack, and reused. For example, there is known a configuration for detecting the deterioration degree of a secondary battery in a battery pack. In the configuration, after discharging is performed until the state of charge (SOC) of the battery pack is equal to or lower than the lower limit value of a normal use range, an individual secondary battery module is taken out and the remaining capacity of each is detected. The capacity difference between the secondary battery modules is calculated and compared with a threshold value, and when the capacity difference is equal to or greater than a predetermined value, it is assumed that the remaining lifetime of the secondary battery module having a small capacity is equal to or less than a predetermined value, and the deterioration degree for each secondary battery module is determined.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure describes a deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery, which is capable of determining a deterioration degree of a secondary battery with high accuracy with a simple configuration. According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a deterioration degree determination device includes: a battery information acquisition unit that acquires battery information related to the secondary battery; a feasibility determination unit that determines feasibility of determination of the deterioration degree for each secondary battery based on the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit and a feasibility determination reference prepared in advance; a battery characteristic acquisition unit that acquires a battery characteristic related to transition of a battery state in a predetermined voltage section for the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible by the feasibility determination unit; and a deterioration degree determination unit that determines the deterioration degree of the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit or a battery characteristic relationship value calculated based on the battery characteristic.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Objects, features and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent from the following detailed description with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram showing a configuration of a deterioration degree determination device in an embodiment 1;

FIG. 2 is a conceptual diagram showing a configuration of a battery pack and a conceptual diagram of a vehicle mounted with the battery pack in the embodiment 1;

FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in the embodiment 1;

FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram showing a feasibility determination reference in the embodiment 1;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a method for determining a deterioration degree of a secondary battery in the embodiment 1;

FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a method for manufacturing the battery pack in the embodiment 1;

FIG. 7 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in a modified embodiment 1;

FIG. 8 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in a modified embodiment 2;

FIG. 9 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in a modified embodiment 3;

FIG. 10 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in a modified embodiment 4;

FIG. 11 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in a modified embodiment 5;

FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a method for determining a deterioration degree of a secondary battery in an embodiment 2;

FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing a method for determining a deterioration degree of a secondary battery in a modified embodiment 6;

FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing a method for determining a deterioration degree of a secondary battery in an embodiment 3;

FIG. 15 is a conceptual diagram showing a configuration of a deterioration degree determination device in an embodiment 4;

FIG. 16 is a flowchart showing a method for determining the deterioration degree of the secondary battery in the embodiment 4;

FIG. 17 is a conceptual diagram showing a configuration of a deterioration degree determination device in an embodiment 5;

FIG. 18 is a conceptual diagram showing a configuration of a deterioration degree determination device in an embodiment 6;

FIG. 19 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in the embodiment 6;

FIG. 20 is a conceptual diagram showing a configuration of a deterioration degree determination device in a modified embodiment 7;

FIG. 21 is a conceptual diagram showing a configuration of a deterioration degree determination device in an embodiment 7;

FIG. 22 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in the embodiment 7;

FIG. 23 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in a modified embodiment 8;

FIG. 24 is a conceptual diagram showing a battery characteristic in a modified embodiment 9;

FIG. 25 is a conceptual diagram showing an SOC-OCV curve of a secondary battery in an embodiment 8;

FIG. 26 is a flowchart showing a method for determining a deterioration degree of the secondary battery in the embodiment 8;

FIG. 27 is a conceptual diagram showing (a) a discharging curve of the secondary battery and (b) a charging curve of the secondary battery in the embodiment 8;

FIG. 28 is a flowchart showing a method for determining a deterioration degree of a secondary battery in an embodiment 9;

FIG. 29 is a conceptual diagram showing an SOC-OCV curve of a secondary battery in an embodiment 10;

FIG. 30 is a flowchart showing a method for determining a deterioration degree of a secondary battery in an embodiment 11;

FIG. 31 is a conceptual diagram showing (a) a discharging curve of the secondary battery and (b) another discharging curve of the secondary battery in the embodiment 11;

FIG. 32 is a conceptual diagram showing an example of an estimation result in an embodiment 12;

FIG. 33 is a conceptual diagram showing a configuration of a deterioration degree determination device in an embodiment 13; and

FIG. 34 is a flowchart showing a method for determining a deterioration degree of a secondary battery in the embodiment 13.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To begin with, a relevant technology will be described only for understanding the embodiments of the present disclosure.

For example, there is a deterioration degree determination device for detecting the deterioration degree of a secondary battery in a battery pack. In the configuration, after discharging is performed until a state of charging (SOC) of the battery pack is equal to or lower than the lower limit value of a normal use range, an individual secondary battery module is taken out and the remaining capacity of each is detected. The capacity difference between the secondary battery modules is calculated and compared with a threshold value, and when the capacity difference is equal to or greater than a predetermined value, it is assumed that the remaining lifetime of the secondary battery module having a small capacity is equal to or less than a predetermined value, and the deterioration degree for each secondary battery module is determined.

When the variation in the deterioration degree of the secondary battery module included in the battery pack is small, the remaining lifetime, that is, the deterioration degree cannot be derived with high accuracy. For example, when the deterioration degree of all the secondary battery modules included in the battery pack is high or low, the variation of the deterioration degree is unlikely to occur, and thus the detection accuracy of the deterioration degree is inferior. On the other hand, in order to take out the secondary battery module from the battery pack and individually determine the deterioration degree with high accuracy, the configuration tends to be complicated.

The present disclosure provides a deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery, which is capable of determining a deterioration degree of a secondary battery with high accuracy with a simple configuration.

According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery, which determines a deterioration degree of a secondary battery, includes: a battery information acquisition unit that acquires battery information related to the secondary battery; a feasibility determination unit that determines feasibility of determination of the deterioration degree for each secondary battery based on the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit and a feasibility determination reference prepared in advance; a battery characteristic acquisition unit that acquires a battery characteristic related to transition of a battery state in a predetermined voltage section for the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible by the feasibility determination unit; and a deterioration degree determination unit that determines the deterioration degree of the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit or a battery characteristic relationship value calculated based on the battery characteristic.

In the deterioration degree determination device of the above aspect, the deterioration degree of the secondary battery is determined based on the battery characteristic or the battery characteristic relationship value related to the voltage transition in the predetermined voltage section acquired from the secondary battery. Therefore, the deterioration degree can be determined by a simple process. By setting a voltage section that shows a high correlation between the voltage transition of the secondary battery and the deterioration degree as the voltage section to acquire the battery characteristic of the secondary battery, the deterioration degree of the secondary battery can be determined in high accuracy. Before the determination of the deterioration degree of the secondary battery is performed, determination is made on whether the determ ination of the deterioration degree is feasible for each secondary battery, and then the determination of the deterioration degree is performed for the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible. Therefore, the determination accuracy can be improved as a whole by performing the determination of the deterioration degree for the secondary battery in which determination accuracy can be sufficiently ensured.

As described above, according to one aspect of the present disclosure, it is possible to provide a deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery capable of determining the deterioration degree with high accuracy in a simple configuration.

According to another aspect of the present disclosure, in the deterioration degree determination device according to the above aspect, the battery characteristic includes a discharging voltage characteristic based on at least one of a voltage transition when the secondary battery is discharged to a discharging target voltage and a voltage transition after discharging of the secondary battery to the discharging target voltage is stopped. Further, the voltage transition is calculated based on at least one of a section capacity of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, a ratio of a voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to a capacity change of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, a ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to an elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section, and a capacity ratio of the section capacity in the voltage section with respect to a total discharging capacity when discharged to the discharging target voltage.

According to another aspect of the present disclosure, in the deterioration degree determination device according to the above aspect, the battery characteristic includes a charging voltage characteristic based on at least one of a voltage transition when the secondary battery is charged to a charging target voltage and a voltage transition after charging of the secondary battery to the charging target voltage is stopped. The voltage transition is calculated based on at least one of a section capacity of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, a ratio of a voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to a capacity change of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, a ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to an elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section, and a capacity ratio of the section capacity in the voltage section with respect to a total charging capacity when charged to the charging target voltage.

Embodiment 1

An embodiment of a deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 to 6 .

As shown in FIG. 1 , a deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 1 determines the deterioration degree of secondary batteries 21 to 26, and includes a battery information acquisition unit 61, a feasibility determination unit 62, a battery characteristic acquisition unit 63, and a deterioration degree determination unit 65.

The battery information acquisition unit 61 acquires battery information related to the secondary batteries 21 to 26.

The feasibility determination unit 62 determines the feasibility of the deterioration degree determination for each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, based on the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit 61 and the feasibility determination reference prepared in advance.

The battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires the battery characteristic related to the transition of a battery state in a predetermined voltage section for the secondary batteries 21 to 26 for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible by the feasibility determination unit 62.

The deterioration degree determ ination unit 65 determ ines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 or the battery characteristic relationship value calculated based on the battery characteristic.

Hereinafter, the deterioration degree determination device 1 for the secondary battery of the present embodiment 1 will be described in detail.

In the deterioration degree determination device 1 shown in FIG. 1 , the type of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 of which the deterioration degree is to be determined is not limited, and the known secondary battery such as a nickel-metal hydride battery and a lithium ion battery can be a target. The corresponding secondary battery may have a single cell or multiple cells. In the present embodiment 1, as shown in (a) in FIG. 2 , the secondary batteries 21 to 26 form a secondary battery module that is a module that can be individually attached to and detached from a battery pack 20. The number of secondary batteries in the battery pack 20 is not particularly limited, but in the present embodiment 1, the number is six, and the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are connected in series. Instead of the above-mentioned, the secondary batteries 21 to 26 may be connected in parallel. As shown in (b) in FIG. 2 , the corresponding battery pack 20 is mounted on a vehicle 100 as a battery.

As shown in FIG. 1 , the deterioration degree determination device 1 includes a detection unit 3, a storage unit 4, a memory unit 5, a calculation unit 6, a control unit 7, and an update unit 8.

The detection unit 3 includes a voltage value detection unit 31 and a current value detection unit 32. The voltage value detection unit 31 is configured with a predetermined voltmeter and detects the voltage values of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The current value detection unit 32 is configured with a predetermined ammeter and detects the current value flowing through the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The open circuit voltage of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is configured to be acquired based on the voltage value detected by the voltage value detection unit 31.

The storage unit 4 shown in FIG. 1 is configured with a rewritable non-volatile memory, and includes a voltage value storage unit 41 and a current value storage unit 42. The voltage value storage unit 41 stores the voltage value detected by the voltage value detection unit 31, and the current value storage unit 42 stores the current value detected by the current value detection unit 32.

A memory unit 5 shown in FIG. 1 is configured with a non-volatile memory, and includes a correspondence relationship memory unit 51 and a reference value memory unit 52. The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and a total capacity. The form of the corresponding correspondence relationship is not particularly limited, and can be, for example, a calculation formula, a map, a graph, and a table. The corresponding correspondence relationship can be created by machine learning using the measurement-purpose secondary battery, or created based on the measured value obtained by performing an accelerated deterioration test by using the measurement-purpose secondary battery, or created by a calculation formula that logically derives the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the total capacity in a predetermined voltage section by using the secondary battery model. The correspondence relationship stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51 is appropriately set according to the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 described later.

The above-mentioned total capacity can be the capacity from a fully discharged state to a fully charged state in the charging time. Alternatively, the total capacity can be the capacity from the fully charged state to the fully discharged state in the discharging time. The fully discharged state may be an effective fully discharged state defined by a system such as a vehicle on which the secondary battery 2 is mounted, and may be a state in which the lower limit voltage set by the user who uses the deterioration degree determination device 1 has been reached. The fully charged state may be an effective fully charged state defined by the system such as the vehicle and the like, or may be a state in which the upper limit voltage specified by the user has been reached.

The reference value memory unit 52 shown in FIG. 1 stores, in advance, a feasibility reference value to determine the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree, which is used in the feasibility determination unit 62 described later, and a deterioration degree reference value to determine the deterioration degree used in the deterioration degree determination unit 65 described later. Both of the corresponding reference values are appropriately set according to the mode of determination in the feasibility determination unit 62 and the deterioration degree determination unit 65. In the present embodiment 1, multiple reference values are set for the deterioration degree reference value such that the deterioration degree can be divided into five stages and determined.

The control unit 7 shown in FIG. 1 includes a charging and discharging control unit 71. The charging and discharging control unit 71 controls charging and discharging to charge and discharge the secondary battery 2. The charging and discharging control unit 71 is configured with an arithmetic device capable of executing a predetermined program.

The calculation unit 6 shown in FIG. 1 is configured with a predetermined arithmetic device, and includes the battery information acquisition unit 61, the feasibility determination unit 62, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63, a capacity estimation unit 64 as an estimation unit, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65. The battery information acquisition unit 61 acquires battery information that is information related to the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The corresponding battery information may be the history information of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, or can also be the history information replaced with or together with the battery characteristic described later. In the present embodiment 1, the battery information acquisition unit 61 acquires the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 described later as battery information.

The feasibility determination unit 62 shown in FIG. 1 determines the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree for each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit 61 or the battery information relationship value calculated from the corresponding battery information, and the feasibility determination reference stored in the reference value memory unit 52. In the present embodiment 1, the feasibility determination unit 62 determines the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree for each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the battery information relationship value calculated from the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit 61 and the feasibility determination reference. The secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be infeasible is one outside the area of the training data used when the determ ination reference of the deterioration degree is defined in the deterioration degree determination unit 65 described later, and is one belonging to an unlearned area. Therefore, regarding the corresponding secondary battery, there is a possibility that the determination accuracy cannot be sufficiently ensured by the present deterioration degree determination, and thus the deterioration degree determination described later may not be performed. Accordingly, the determination accuracy can be improved as a whole by performing the determination of the deterioration degree for the secondary battery in which determination accuracy can be sufficiently ensured. For the secondary battery of which the deterioration degree has not been determined in the present deterioration degree determination, the total capacity is separately measured by the update unit 8 described later, and can be used as training data to define the determination reference used for the deterioration degree determination from the next time onward. Accordingly, the determination reference can be updated according to the change over time of the secondary battery, and thus high determination accuracy can be maintained.

The feasibility determination reference used in the feasibility determination unit 62 can be created by machine learning using a measurement-purpose secondary battery, be created based on the test measurement value obtained by performing an accelerated deterioration test by using the measurement-purpose secondary battery or the measurement value acquired from the used secondary battery, or be created by a relational expression that logically derives the feasibility determination reference by using the model of the secondary battery. The corresponding feasibility determination reference can be expressed as upper and lower limit values, only an upper limit value or only a lower limit value, or in a map format. For example, as shown in FIG. 4 , a predetermined range calculated by performing machine learning by using the correspondence relationship between a battery information A and a battery information B acquired from the measurement-purpose secondary battery as training data, can be used as the feasibility determination reference. That is, the distance between the data with respect to the corresponding training data can be used as the feasibility determination reference. The distance between the corresponding data can be defined based on the Mahalanobis distance, the Euclidean distance, the Manhattan distance, the Chebyshev distance, and the like.

In the present embodiment 1, the feasibility determination unit 62 is configured to perform feasibility determination based on the Mahalanobis distance calculated as a comparison result between the battery information relationship value calculated from the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit and the feasibility determination reference, by using the preset relational expression related to multiple battery information. Multiple feasibility determination references may be set. That is, after the feasibility of the first deterioration degree determination is determined based on the first feasibility determination reference, the feasibility of the second deterioration degree determination with respect to the secondary battery for which the first deterioration degree determination is determined to be not feasible, may be determined based on the second feasibility determination reference.

The battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires the battery characteristic in a predetermined voltage section of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The battery characteristic of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 can be, for example, a characteristic based on the voltage transition and the temperature transition of the secondary battery 2 in a predetermined voltage section Vs. The corresponding voltage transition, for example, can be calculated based on at least one of the section capacity of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 in the predetermined voltage section, the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 with respect to the capacity change of the secondary battery 2 in the predetermined voltage section, and the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 with respect to the elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section. The predetermined voltage section can be a voltage section in which the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 and the transition of the battery state show a correlation. Such a voltage section can be set based on the type and configuration of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, or can be derived by machine learning using the secondary battery. The battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may acquire the absolute value of the acquired value as the battery characteristic. The predetermined voltage section Vs in which the battery characteristic of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is acquired can be set for each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, or can be appropriately changed.

In the present embodiment 1, the discharging voltage characteristic is used as the battery characteristic. As shown in FIG. 3 , the discharging voltage characteristic is calculated based on the voltage transition when the secondary battery 2 is discharged to a discharging target voltage VP. The discharging target voltage VP is not particularly limited, but can be a voltage equal to or lower than the lower limit value in a normal use range Vn for the voltage value of the secondary battery 2.

The voltage transition, for example, can be calculated based on at least one of the section capacity of the secondary battery 2 in the predetermined voltage section Vs, the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery 2 with respect to the capacity change of the secondary battery 2 in the predetermined voltage section Vs, and the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery 2 with respect to the elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section Vs.

The predetermined voltage section Vs can be a voltage section in which the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 and the transition of the battery state show a correlation. Such the voltage section Vs can be set based on the type and configuration of the secondary battery 2, or can be derived by machine learning using the secondary battery 2. For example, in the present embodiment 1, as shown in FIG. 2 , the predetermined voltage section Vs is a section from a voltage value V1 to a voltage value V2. The voltage section Vs is a section in which the difference in the discharging voltage characteristic is remarkable according to the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2.

In the present embodiment 1, the capacity estimation unit 64 shown in FIG. 1 estimates the total capacity of the secondary battery 2 for which the deterioration degree determination is determined to be feasible by the feasibility determination unit 62 based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. For the estimation of the total capacity, a prediction model such as a regression formula created based on the training data acquired in advance can be used, and for example, linear regression, Lasso regression, Ridge regression, decision tree, and support vector regression can be used.

The deterioration degree determination unit 65 shown in FIG. 1 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 based on the battery characteristic or the battery characteristic relationship value. The battery characteristic relationship value is a value calculated based on the battery characteristic, and in the present embodiment 1, the estimation result of the capacity estimation unit 64 is adopted as the battery characteristic relationship value. Therefore, in the present embodiment 1, the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 based on the estimation result of the capacity estimation unit 64. The determination method can be performed by comparing the estimation result of the capacity estimation unit 64 with the reference value stored in advance in the reference value memory unit 52.

The update unit 8 shown in FIG. 1 is configured with a predetermined arithmetic device and includes a reference value update unit 81. The reference value update unit 81 updates the feasibility determination reference and the deterioration degree determination reference stored in the reference value memory unit 52. The corresponding update can be performed by, with respect to the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be infeasible by the feasibility determination unit 62 described above, acquiring the measured value of the total capacity by charging and discharging the corresponding secondary battery by the charging and discharging control unit 71, and updating the feasibility determination reference and the deterioration degree determination reference stored in the reference value memory unit 52 with the measured value as additional training data.

The flow of a method for determining the deterioration degree by the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 1 will be described below.

First, in a step S1 shown in FIG. 5 , as a preparation process, the secondary batteries 21 to 26 in the form of a module are taken out from the used battery pack 20 shown in (a) in FIG. 2 . In a step S2, the charging and discharging control unit 71 individually discharges the remaining capacity of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. As shown in FIG. 3 , the discharging continues until the open circuit voltage reaches the predetermined discharging target voltage VP. When the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are nickel-metal hydride batteries, a memory effect may occur in the corresponding secondary batteries 21 to 26, but the cancellation of the memory effect is also performed at the same time for one, which is discharged down to the discharging target voltage VP or to a voltage close to the discharging target voltage VP, among the secondary batteries 21 to 26.

Along with discharging of the remaining capacity in the step S2 shown in FIG. 5 , in a step S3 shown in FIG. 5 , the battery characteristic of each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. In the present embodiment 1, the above-mentioned discharging voltage characteristic is acquired as the battery characteristic. As described above, the discharging voltage characteristic is based on the voltage transition in the predetermined voltage section Vs of each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 shown in FIG. 3 .

In the present embodiment 1, as shown in FIG. 3 , with respect to the first secondary battery 21, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires the voltage temporal change that indicates the relationship of the voltage change with respect to the passage of time from a discharging start T₀ to a discharging end T _(P1) as the voltage transition. The differential value in a voltage VA within the predetermined voltage section Vs, that is, the slope of the tangent line at the voltage VA indicated by a reference numeral 21A in the graph of the voltage temporal change shown in FIG. 3 is calculated, and is used as the discharging voltage characteristic of the first secondary battery 21. As shown in FIG. 3 , for the second secondary battery 22, the voltage temporal change is also acquired in the same manner as the voltage transition, and the differential value at the voltage VA within the predetermined voltage section Vs indicated by a reference numeral 22A is calculated and is used as the discharging voltage characteristic of the second secondary battery 22. Similarly, for the third to sixth secondary batteries 23 to 26, the voltage temporal change is acquired as the voltage transition, and the differential value at the voltage VA is calculated to be used as the respective discharging voltage characteristics.

In the present embodiment 1, as the discharging voltage characteristic, the voltage temporal change is acquired as the voltage transition to use the differential value in the voltage VA within the predetermined voltage section Vs, but instead of the above-mentioned, the ratio of the voltage change between the two points in the voltage temporal change derived as the voltage transition, that is, the slope of the straight line passing through the corresponding two points in the graph of the voltage temporal change may be calculated and used as the discharging voltage characteristic. For example, as two points in the voltage temporal change of the first secondary battery 21 shown in FIG. 3 , two points of start time T_(A1) and end time T_(A2) of the voltage section Vs can be adopted, and the same two points can also be adopted in the other secondary batteries 22 to 26.

As shown in a step S4 of FIG. 5 , the battery information acquisition unit 61 acquires the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 as battery information. Thereafter, in a step S5, the feasibility determination unit 62 determines the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree. Specifically, the feasibility determination unit 62 determines the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree based on whether the distance between the data of the feasibility determination reference stored in the reference value memory unit 52 and the battery information relationship value calculated from the acquired battery information is within a predetermined range, that is, whether the corresponding battery information relationship value is within the feasibility determination reference shown in FIG. 4 .

When the acquired battery information is not within the feasibility determination reference, the feasibility determination unit 62 determines that the determination of the deterioration degree is not feasible, and proceeds to No in the step S5 shown in FIG. 5 . In a step S6, among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, with respect to one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is infeasible, the process proceeds to a step S9 described later without determining the deterioration degree.

On the other hand, in the step S5 shown in FIG. 5 , when the acquired battery information is within the feasibility determination reference, the feasibility determination unit 62 determines that the determination of the deterioration degree is feasible, and proceeds to Yes in the step S5. In a step S7, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the total capacity of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, that is, the full charging capacity or the full discharging capacity, based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. In the present embodiment 1, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the total capacity of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 from the discharging voltage characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 as the battery characteristic, based on the correspondence relationship between the total capacity and the discharging voltage characteristic based on the prediction model stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51.

In a step S8 shown in FIG. 5 , the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the total capacity estimated by the capacity estimation unit 64. Accordingly, the process proceeds to a step S9, and the present deterioration degree determination is ended. Thereafter, the process proceeds to a symbol A, and in a step S10, the update unit 8 determines whether there is a secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be infeasible by the feasibility determination unit 62 in the step S5. When determination is made that there is no secondary battery of which the deterioration degree is not determined, the process proceeds to No in the step S10, and the control flow is ended. On the other hand, when determination is made in the step S5 that there is a secondary battery of which the deterioration degree is not determined, the process proceeds to Yes in the step S10.

In a step S11 shown in FIG. 5 , the charging and discharging control unit 71 charges and discharges the secondary battery of which the deterioration degree is not determined, and measures the measured value of the total capacity. In a step S12, the reference value update unit 81 updates the feasibility determination reference and the deterioration degree determination reference stored in the reference value memory unit 52 by using the corresponding measured value as additional training data. Both of the corresponding reference values will be used for the deterioration degree determination from the next time onward.

Next, a method for manufacturing a rebuilt product by using and assembling the secondary battery 2 forming the module taken out from the used battery pack 20 into the new battery pack 20 will be described below.

First, in a step S13 shown in FIG. 6 , multiple secondary batteries 2 taken out from the battery pack 20 are prepared. In a step S14, the battery characteristic of each of the secondary batteries 2 is acquired. The acquisition of the corresponding battery characteristic can be performed as in the case of acquiring the battery characteristic in the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 1. Thereafter, in a step S15, the secondary battery 2 is ranked based on the corresponding battery characteristic or the battery characteristic relationship value calculated based on the corresponding battery characteristic. In the present embodiment 1, the total capacity of the secondary battery 2 is estimated based on the battery characteristic as the battery characteristic relationship value, and the secondary battery 2 is ranked based on whether the absolute value of the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 calculated from the corresponding total capacity is within a predetermined range. In the present embodiment 1, the absolute value of the deterioration degree is divided into a predetermined range of five stages, and the ranks are A, B, C, D, and E in order from the one with the smallest absolute value of the deterioration degree. The ranking criteria can be set as appropriate.

Next, in a step S16 shown in FIG. 6 , the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are selected based on the rank. In the present embodiment 1, sorting is performed for each rank. Accordingly, the secondary batteries 2 included in the same rank have the same deterioration degree. In a step S17, the secondary batteries 2 of the same rank are combined to assemble the battery pack 20 to create a rebuilt product. Accordingly, the secondary battery 2 included in the battery pack 20 of a rebuilt product has the same absolute value of the deterioration degree, and the difference in the deterioration degree can be set to a predetermined reference value or less. The reference value for the difference in the deterioration degree can be appropriately set according to the ranking reference. In the present embodiment 1, the battery pack 20 is created of the secondary batteries 2 of the same rank, but is not limited thereto, and the battery pack 20 may be created within a predetermined range of ranks, for example, the battery pack 20 may be created from the secondary batteries 2 included in the A rank and the B rank. The secondary battery 2 ranked at the lowest rank E may be discarded as unusable, or may be disassembled and used for recycling of members.

Thereafter, in the present embodiment 1, in step S18 shown in FIG. 6 , supplementary charging is performed in units of the battery pack 20. Accordingly, the secondary batteries 21 to 26 can be used as the battery pack 20.

Next, the operation effect of the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 1 will be described in detail.

In the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 1, the deterioration degree of the secondary battery is determined based on the battery characteristic or the battery characteristic relationship value related to the voltage transition in the predetermined voltage section acquired from the secondary battery 2. Therefore, the deterioration degree can be determined by a simple process. By setting a voltage section that shows a high correlation between the voltage transition of the secondary battery 2 and the deterioration degree as the voltage section to acquire the battery characteristic of the secondary battery 2, the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 can be determined in high accuracy. Before performing the determination of the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2, determination is made on whether the determination of the deterioration degree is feasible for each secondary battery 2, and then the determination of the deterioration degree is performed for the secondary battery 2 for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible. Therefore, the determination accuracy can be improved as a whole by performing the determination of the deterioration degree for the secondary battery 2 in which determination accuracy can be sufficiently ensured.

In the present embodiment 1, the feasibility determination unit 62 performs the feasibility determination based on a comparison result between the battery information relationship value calculated from the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit 61 and the feasibility determination reference, by using the preset relational expression related to multiple battery information. Accordingly, the determination accuracy can be improved by appropriately adjusting the relational expression.

According to the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 1, the battery pack 20 includes the multiple secondary batteries 2 having a usage history, and it is possible to provide the battery pack in which the battery characteristic related to the transition of the battery state of the predetermined voltage section Vs in the secondary battery 2 or the battery characteristic relationship value calculated based on the battery characteristic is within a predetermined range. In the battery pack as a rebuilt product, the battery pack 20 having a small variation in battery characteristics can be provided. As the voltage section Vs for acquiring the battery characteristic of the secondary battery 2, by setting the voltage section Vs showing a high correlation between the voltage transition of the secondary battery 2 and the deterioration degree, the variation in the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 included in the battery pack 20 becomes small, and thus the life extension and the quality improvement of the battery pack 20 can be attempted.

In the present embodiment 1, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the total capacity of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 from the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the corresponding estimation result, but instead of the above-mentioned, the total capacity based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may be not estimated, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may acquire the absolute value of the acquired value as the battery characteristic, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree based on the corresponding absolute value. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the difference in the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63.

In the present embodiment 1, the battery pack 20 is assembled by classifying the secondary batteries 21 to 26 into classes such that the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is within a predetermined range, but the battery pack 20 may be assembled by classifying the secondary batteries 21 to 26 into classes such that the difference between the deterioration degree and the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is within a predetermined range.

In the present embodiment 1, the battery characteristic is the discharging voltage characteristic based on the voltage transition in the predetermined voltage sections Vs1 and Vs2 in the secondary batteries 21 to 26. When the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are nickel-metal hydride batteries, at the time of reusing the used secondary batteries 21 to 26, the used secondary batteries 21 to 26 may be discharged for the purpose of canceling the memory effect, and by acquiring the discharging voltage characteristic during the discharging, the work process for reusing the secondary batteries 21 to 26 can be simplified.

In the present embodiment 1, the discharging voltage characteristic is calculated based on the voltage transition during the discharging of the secondary battery 2, but instead of or together with the above-mentioned, the discharging voltage characteristic may be calculated based on the voltage transition during the voltage relaxation in which the open circuit voltage is returned after discharging is performed to reach the discharging target voltage VP and the discharging is stopped. For example, as in a modified embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 7 , in the first secondary battery 21, based on the voltage transition in the predetermined voltage section Vs in the voltage relaxation after the time T _(P1) at which discharging is stopped after the discharging is performed to reach the discharging target voltage VP, the differential value at the predetermined voltage VA indicated by the reference numeral 21A can be calculated and used as the discharging voltage characteristic. Similarly, in the second secondary battery 22, based on the voltage transition in the predetermined voltage section Vs in the voltage relaxation after time T_(P2) at which the discharging is stopped, the differential value at the predetermined voltage VA indicated by the reference numeral 22A can be calculated and be used as the discharging voltage characteristic, and also similarly for the other secondary batteries 23 to 26 (not shown), the discharging voltage characteristic can be acquired based on the voltage transition in the predetermined voltage section Vs in the voltage relaxation. Also in this case, the same operation effect as the operation effect of the present embodiment 1 is obtained.

In the present embodiment 1, the capacity estimation unit 64 that estimates the total capacity of the secondary battery by using the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 as the battery characteristic relationship value, is provided, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the estimation result of the capacity estimation unit 64. Accordingly, the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 can be detected with high accuracy.

In the present embodiment 1, as the voltage transition, the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery 2 to the elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section Vs, that is, the differential value in the voltage temporal change is calculated, and is used as the discharging voltage characteristic. Accordingly, the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 can be determined with high accuracy and easily.

In addition, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may replace calculating the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery 2 to the elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section Vs as the voltage transition, or in addition to the above-mentioned, as in a modified embodiment 2 shown in FIG. 8 , may calculate the capacity change amount of each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 in the predetermined voltage section Vs as a section capacity Qp and use the section capacity Qp as the discharging voltage characteristic. The section capacity Qp can be calculated from the current value flowing through the secondary batteries 21 to 26 and the time during which the current flows in the voltage section Vs detected by the current value detection unit 32. Also in this case, the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 can be determined with high accuracy and easily based on the discharging voltage characteristic.

A total charging and discharging capacity Qt shown in FIG. 8 may be calculated as the capacity of all sections of discharging time T₀ to T_(P1) and T₀ to T_(P2) in each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, and the capacity ratio, that is, the ratio of the section capacity Qp to the total charging and discharging capacity Qt may be calculated and be used as the discharging voltage characteristic. Instead of the total charging and discharging capacity Qt, a specific section capacity Qt′ that is the capacity of the specific voltage section including the voltage section for calculating the battery characteristic may be calculated, and the capacity ratio that is a ratio of the section capacity Qp to the specific section capacity Qt′ may be calculated and used as the discharging voltage characteristic. Also in this case, the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 can be determined with high accuracy and easily based on the discharging voltage characteristic.

In the present embodiment 1, as the discharging voltage characteristic, the voltage temporal change is acquired as the voltage transition to use the differential value in the voltage VA within the predetermined voltage section Vs, but instead of the above-mentioned, as in a modified embodiment 3 shown in FIG. 9 , the voltage-capacity change indicating the relationship of the voltage change with respect to the capacity from a capacity Q₀ at the discharging start time to a capacity Q_(p1) at the discharging end time as the voltage transition, may be acquired. The differential value in the voltage VA within the predetermined voltage section Vs, that is, the slope of the tangent line at the voltage VA in the graph of the voltage-capacity change may be calculated, and may be used as the discharging voltage characteristic of the first secondary battery 21. Also in this case, the same operation effect as the operation effect of the present embodiment 1 is obtained.

In the present embodiment 1, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 provided in the deterioration degree determination device 1 calculates the battery characteristic to acquire the battery characteristic, but instead of the above-mentioned, the deterioration degree determination device 1 may have an external input unit and calculate the battery characteristic by using an externally provided arithmetic device, such that by inputting the corresponding battery characteristic to the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 via the external input unit, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may acquire the battery characteristic.

In the present embodiment 1, the discharging voltage characteristic is adopted as the battery characteristic, but at the same time, as shown in a modified embodiment 4 shown in FIG. 10 , the battery characteristic may include the charging voltage characteristic based on the voltage transition when the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are charged up to a predetermined charging target voltage VQ. The charging target voltage VQ is not particularly limited, but in the present embodiment 1, is set to be a value larger than the lower limit value of the normal use range Vn and smaller than the upper limit value thereof. The other configuration elements are the same as in the case of the embodiment 1.

In the present modified embodiment 4, the calculation of the voltage transition in charging can be performed in the same manner as the calculation of the voltage transition in the discharging voltage characteristic in the embodiment 1 and each modified embodiment, and the calculated result is used as the charging voltage characteristic. That is, as shown in FIG. 10 , as the voltage transition, the voltage temporal change indicating the relationship of the voltage change with respect to the passage of time from the charging start, which are the discharging ends T _(P1) and T_(P2), to the charging ends T_(Q1) and T_(Q2) is acquired. The differential value in a voltage VB within a predetermined voltage section VsB, that is, the slope of the tangent line at the voltage VB indicated by a reference numeral 21B in the graph of the voltage temporal change shown in FIG. 10 is calculated, and is used as the charging voltage characteristic of the first secondary battery 21. As shown in FIG. 10 , for the second secondary battery 22, the voltage temporal change is also acquired in the same manner as the voltage transition, and the differential value at the voltage VB within the predetermined voltage section Vs indicated by a reference numeral 22B is calculated and is used as the discharging voltage characteristic of the second secondary battery 22. Similarly, also for the third to sixth secondary batteries 23 to 26, the voltage temporal change is acquired as the voltage transition, and the differential value at the voltage VB is calculated to be used as the respective charging voltage characteristics. The predetermined voltage section VsB is a section from the voltage values V3 to V4, and is a section in which the difference in charging voltage characteristic is remarkable according to the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2.

The charging voltage characteristic may be the ratio of the voltage change between two points of the start time TB11 and TB21 and the end time TB12 and TB22 of the predetermined voltage section VsB as in the case of calculating the discharging voltage characteristic in the above-described embodiment 1, may be the section capacity Qp in the voltage section VsB, or may be the capacity ratio of the section capacity Qp to the total charging and discharging capacity QT by calculating the capacity of all sections of charging time T_(P1) to T_(Q1) and T_(P2) to T_(Q2), that is, the total charging and discharging capacity QT when charging is performed to reach the charging target voltage VQ.

In the present modified embodiment 4, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires both the discharging voltage characteristic and the charging voltage characteristic, and the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the total capacity of the secondary battery 2 based on the discharging voltage characteristic and the charging voltage characteristic. Accordingly the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 can be determined with higher accuracy.

When the battery pack 20 of a rebuilt product is manufactured by using the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present modified embodiment 4, each of the secondary batteries 2 is charged before the battery pack 20 is assembled, and thus supplementary charging of the battery pack 20 in step S15 in FIG. 6 becomes unnecessary.

In the present modified embodiment 4, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires the charging voltage characteristic after acquiring the discharging voltage characteristic by discharging and then charging the secondary battery 2 but is not limited thereto, and may acquire the discharging voltage characteristic after acquiring the charging voltage characteristic by charging and then discharging the secondary battery.

In the present modified embodiment 4, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires both the discharging voltage characteristic and the charging voltage characteristic, but instead of the above-mentioned, may acquire only the charging voltage characteristic. In this case, the determination accuracy may be inferior to the determination accuracy in the case of acquiring both the discharging voltage characteristic and the charging voltage characteristic. On the other hand, when the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are nickel-metal hydride batteries, a memory effect may occur, and when only the discharging voltage characteristic is acquired, in the discharging voltage characteristic, variation may occur in the voltage transition due to the influence of the memory effect, such that there is a concern that the improvement of the determination accuracy is restricted. However, when only the charging voltage characteristic, which is acquired after the remaining capacity is discharged, is acquired, the charging voltage characteristic is acquired after the cancellation of the memory effect is attempted, such that the influence of the memory effect is small, and the determination accuracy can be expected to be improved.

The charging voltage characteristic in the present modified embodiment 4, as in the case of the discharging voltage characteristic of the embodiment 1, may be calculated based on the voltage transition during the voltage relaxation in which the open circuit voltage is returned after charging is performed to reach the predetermined charging target voltage VQ and the charging is stopped. For example, as in a modified embodiment 5 shown in FIG. 11 , based on the voltage transition in the predetermined voltage section VsB in the voltage relaxation after time T_(Q1) at which charging is stopped in the first secondary battery 21, the differential value at the predetermined voltage VB indicated by the reference numeral 21B may be calculated to be used as the charging voltage characteristic. Similarly, based on the voltage transition in the predetermined voltage section VsB in the voltage relaxation after time T_(Q2) at which charging is stopped in the second secondary battery 22, the differential value at the predetermined voltage VB indicated by the reference numeral 22B may be calculated and used as the charging voltage characteristic. Also in this case, the same operation effect as the operation effect of the present embodiment 1 is obtained.

As described above, according to the above aspect, the deterioration degree determination device 1 for the secondary battery capable of improving workability when the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 forming the battery pack 20 is determined, can be provided.

In the present modified embodiment 4, as in the modified embodiment of the case of the embodiment 1, the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 without estimating the total capacity. The battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may acquire the absolute value of the acquired value as the battery characteristic, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree based on the corresponding absolute value. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 based on the difference in the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. The battery pack 20 may be assembled by classifying the secondary battery 2 into classes such that the difference between the deterioration degree and the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 is within a predetermined range.

Embodiment 2

In the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the above-described embodiment 1, the battery information acquisition unit 61 acquires the battery characteristic of the secondary battery 2 acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 as the battery information, but in the embodiment 2, the history information of the secondary battery 2 is acquired as the battery information. The history information of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 can include a charging electricity amount, a discharging electricity amount, a battery temperature, a charging state (SOC), an equalization frequency, an outside air temperature in each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, the maximum value, the minimum value, the average value, the accumulated value, and the like in a predetermined period of the usage period, the temperature, and the like of a device mounted with the corresponding secondary battery. The predetermined period can be any period up to the present, and may be the entire period up to the present. Other configurations are the same as in the case of the embodiment 1, and the same reference numerals as those in the case of the embodiment 1 are assigned and the description thereof will be omitted.

In the flow of the deterioration degree determination in the present embodiment 2, as shown in FIG. 12 , first, the step S1 is performed as in the case of the embodiment 1. Thereafter, the process proceeds to a step S40, and the battery information acquisition unit 61 attempts to acquire the battery information of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. In the present embodiment 2, the battery information acquisition unit 61, for example, attempts to acquire the history information of the charging electricity amount in each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 as the battery information A, and attempts to acquire the temperature history in each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 as the battery information B. The type of history information to be attempted to acquire here is not limited thereto.

Next, in a step S41 shown in FIG. 12 , determination is made on whether the battery information A and B can be acquired by the battery information acquisition unit 61. When the battery information A and B cannot be acquired in the step S41, the process proceeds to No in the step S41, and in a step S42, the measurement is failure, such that the flow is ended without determining the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2.

On the other hand, when the battery information can be acquired in the step S41 shown in FIG. 12 , the process proceeds to Yes in the step S41. In the step S5, as in the case of the embodiment 1, the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree is determined by the feasibility determination unit 62. Among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, for one of which the acquired battery information is not within the feasibility determination reference, the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be not feasible, steps S6 and S9 are performed as in the case of the embodiment 1, the process proceeds to the symbol A in FIG. 5 , and steps S10 to S12 are performed to end the flow.

On the other hand, in the step S5 shown in FIG. 12 , among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, for one of which the acquired battery information is within the feasibility determination reference, the feasibility determination unit 62 determines that the determination of the deterioration degree is feasible, the process proceeds to Yes in the step S5. In a step S20, among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, with respect to one for which the deterioration degree determination is determined to be feasible, the remaining capacity is individually discharged as in the step S5 of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 . When the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are nickel-metal hydride batteries, the memory effect is also canceled at the same time.

Thereafter, in a step S21, with respect to one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, the discharging voltage characteristic is acquired as the battery characteristic as in the step S3 of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 . As in the case of the embodiment 1, the steps S7 to S12 are performed to end the flow.

In the present embodiment 2, the battery information acquisition unit 61 acquires the history information of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 as the battery information. Accordingly, the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree is determined based on the history information of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, and thus the determination accuracy can be improved.

In the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the above-described embodiment 1, the battery information acquisition unit 61 acquires the battery characteristic of the secondary battery 2 acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 as the battery information, and in the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the embodiment 2, the battery information acquisition unit 61 acquires the history information of the secondary battery 2 as the battery information. Instead of the above-mentioned, the deterioration degree determination device 1 of a modified embodiment 6 is configured to acquire both the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 and the history information of the secondary battery 2 as the battery information. Other configurations are the same as in the case of the embodiment 1 and the embodiment 2, and the same reference numerals as those in the embodiment 1 and the embodiment 2 are given and the description thereof will be omitted.

In the flow of the deterioration degree determination in the modified embodiment 6, as shown in FIG. 13 , first, the step S1, the step S40, and the step S41 are performed as in the case of the embodiment 2. When the battery information cannot be acquired in the step S41, the process proceeds to No in the step S41 as in the case of the embodiment 2, and in the step S42, the measurement is failure, such that the flow is ended without determining the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2.

On the other hand, when the battery information can be acquired in the step S41 shown in FIG. 13 , as in the case of the embodiment 2, in the step S20, the remaining capacity of the secondary battery for which the battery information can be acquired is discharged, and the memory effect is also canceled at the same time when the secondary battery is a nickel-metal hydride battery. In the step S21, the battery characteristic is acquired as in the case of the embodiment 2, and the process proceeds to a step S50.

In the step S50 shown in FIG. 13 , the feasibility determination unit 62 determines the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree based on the battery characteristic and history information of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 as the battery information and the feasibility determination reference. Among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, for one of which the acquired battery information is not within the feasibility determination reference, the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be not feasible, steps S6 and S9 are performed as in the case of the embodiment 1, the process proceeds to the symbol A in FIG. 5 , and steps S10 to S12 are performed to end the flow. On the other hand, among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, with respect to one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, as in the case of the embodiment 1, the steps S7 to S9 are performed, the process proceeds to the symbol A in FIG. 5 , and the steps S10 to S12 are performed to end the flow.

According to the modified embodiment 6, the battery information used for determining the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree includes both the battery characteristic and the history information of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 as described above, and thus the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree can be determined with higher accuracy. The modified embodiment 6 also has the same operation effect as in the case of the embodiments 1 and 2.

Embodiment 3

The deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 3 has the same configuration as the configuration of the embodiment 2 shown in FIG. 12 . In the present embodiment 3, the reference value memory unit 52 stores a first feasibility determination reference D1 and a second feasibility determination reference D2. In the present embodiment 3, the first feasibility determination reference D1 stores the Mahalanobis distance D1 as the inter-data distance D1, the second feasibility determination reference D2 stores the Mahalanobis distance as the inter-data distance, and the relationship of both is set as D1 < D2.

In the present embodiment 3, the correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores a first correspondence relationship and a second correspondence relationship. The first correspondence relationship is a correspondence relationship suitable for determ ining the deterioration degree of the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible by the first feasibility determination reference D1. The second correspondence relationship is a correspondence relationship suitable for determining the deterioration degree of the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible by the second feasibility determination reference D2. The correspondence relationship can be created as in the case of the embodiment 1.

Next, the flow of a method for determining the deterioration degree by the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 3 will be described below with reference to FIG. 14 . In the present embodiment 3, the same reference numerals as those in the case of the embodiment 2 shown in FIG. 12 are designated by the same reference numerals, and the description thereof will be omitted.

In the flow of the present embodiment 3, instead of the case of the embodiment 2 shown in FIG. 12 , as shown in FIG. 14 , in the step S41, among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, for one of which the battery information can be acquired, the process proceeds to Yes in the step S41, and in a step S51, the feasibility determ ination unit 62 determ ines whether the determ ination of the deterioration degree of the secondary battery of which battery information can be acquired is feasible based on the first feasibility determination reference D1. In the step S51, among the corresponding secondary batteries, with respect to one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, the process proceeds to Yes in the step S51, and the step S22 and the step S23 are performed as in the step S20 and the step S21 of the case of the embodiment 2 .

Thereafter, in a step S71 shown in FIG. 14 , based on the first correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the total capacity based on the prediction model stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the total capacity, that is, the full charging capacity or the full discharging capacity for, among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible in the step S51 from the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. As in the case of the embodiment 2, the deterioration degree is determined in the step S8, the step S9 is performed to proceed to the symbol A in FIG. 5 , and the steps S10 to S12 are performed to end the flow.

On the other hand, in the step S51 shown in FIG. 14 , among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, with respect to one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is not feasible based on the first feasibility determination reference D1, the process proceeds to No in the step S51. In a step S52, among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, with respect to one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be not feasible in the step S51, the feasibility determination unit 62 determines whether the determination of the deterioration degree is feasible based on the second feasibility determination reference D2. In the step S52, when the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, the process proceeds to Yes in the step S52, and the step S24 and the step S25 are performed as in the step S20 and the step S21 of the case of the embodiment 2.

Thereafter, in a step S72 shown in FIG. 14 , based on the second correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the total capacity based on the prediction model stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the total capacity, that is, the full charging capacity or the full discharging capacity for, among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible in the step S52 from the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. As in the case of the embodiment 2, the deterioration degree is determined in the step S8, and the process proceeds to the step S9 to end the present deterioration degree determination. On the other hand, among the secondary batteries 21 to 26, with respect to one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be not feasible in the step S52, the process proceeds to No in the step S52 and then proceeds to the steps S6 and S9 as in the case of the embodiment 1 to end the present deterioration degree determination. After the step S9, the process proceeds to the symbol A in FIG. 5 , and the steps S10 to S12 are performed to end the flow.

The deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 3 has the first feasibility determination reference D1 and the second feasibility determination reference as multiple feasibility determination references, and has, as multiple correspondence relationships, a first correspondence relationship and a second correspondence relationship suitable for one for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible based on the respective feasibility determination references. Accordingly, the consistency between the reference of the determination feasibility of the deterioration degree and the reference of the determination the deterioration degree is high, and the deterioration degree can be determined with higher accuracy. The present embodiment also has the same operation effect as in the case of the embodiment 1.

Embodiment 4

In a deterioration degree determination device of the embodiment 4, as shown in FIG. 15 , the calculation unit 6 further includes a vehicle information acquisition unit 66. As vehicle information, the vehicle type of the vehicle 100, the product number of the battery pack, the module of the secondary battery, and the like, the position of the module in the battery pack, the year of manufacture, the period of use, and the travel distance of the vehicle 100, the location of the store of the vehicle 100, and the like can be exemplified. The reference value memory unit 52 stores the vehicle information reference as the determination reference of the vehicle information for determining the feasibility of the determination of the deterioration degree. In the present embodiment 4, multiple specific vehicle types are stored as the vehicle information. The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores the correspondence relationships corresponding to the corresponding specific vehicle types, respectively. Other configurations are the same as in the case of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 1 and the embodiment 2 (not shown), and the same reference numerals are given and the description thereof will be omitted.

Next, the flow of a method for determining the deterioration degree by the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 4 will be described below. In the present embodiment 4, the same reference numerals as those in the case of the embodiment 2 shown in FIG. 12 are designated by the same reference numerals, and the description thereof will be omitted. In the flow of the present embodiment 4, instead of the step S40 of the embodiment 2 shown in FIG. 12 , as shown in FIG. 16 , after the step S1, the process proceeds to the step S43, and the vehicle information acquisition unit 66 acquires the vehicle information of the vehicle 100 mounted with the battery pack 20. The corresponding vehicle information is not limited, but in the present embodiment 4, the vehicle type of the vehicle 100 is acquired.

Thereafter, in a step S44 shown in FIG. 16 , the feasibility determination unit 62 determines whether the vehicle information acquired by the vehicle information acquisition unit 66 corresponds to the vehicle information reference. In the present embodiment 4, determination is made on whether the vehicle type acquired by the vehicle information acquisition unit 66 corresponds to the specific vehicle type stored in the reference value memory unit 52. In the step S44, when determination is made that the corresponding vehicle type does not correspond to a specific vehicle type, the process proceeds to No in the step S44, and the flow is ended without determining the deterioration degree in the step S42 as in the case of the embodiment 2.

On the other hand, in the step S44 shown in FIG. 16 , when determination is made that the acquired vehicle information corresponds to the vehicle information reference, the process proceeds to Yes in the step S44. As in the case of the embodiment 2, the steps S40 to S42, the steps S5 to S6, and the steps S20 to S21 are performed. After the step S21, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the total capacity of the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible according to the vehicle information in a step S73. That is, the capacity estimation unit 64 changes the estimation formula used for estimating the corresponding total capacity according to the vehicle information. In the step S8, the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the estimation result of the total capacity. After the step S8 and after the step S6, as in the embodiment 2, the process proceeds to the step S9 to end the present deterioration degree determination. Thereafter, the process proceeds to the symbol A in FIG. 5 , and the steps S10 to S12 are performed to end the flow.

According to the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 4, the capacity estimation unit 64 can determine the deterioration degree according to the vehicle type by using an estimation formula for estimating the total capacity corresponding to the vehicle type as the vehicle information, and the estimation accuracy is further improved. The deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 4 can also have the same operation effect as the operation effect of the present embodiment 1.

Embodiment 5

In the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 5, in addition to the configuration of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 1 , the calculation unit 6 includes an impedance characteristic acquisition unit 67 as shown in FIG. 17 . The impedance characteristic acquisition unit 67 has a configuration for measuring complex impedance, and is configured to be able to measure the impedance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. Other configurations are the same as those of the embodiment 1, and the same reference numerals are given to the same configurations of the embodiment 1, and the description thereof will be omitted.

In the present embodiment 5, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires the discharging voltage characteristic in the predetermined voltage section Vs shown in FIG. 3 , as in the case of the embodiment 1. The impedance characteristic acquisition unit 67 measures the complex impedance at the discharging end time T_(P1) and T_(P2) shown in FIG. 3 , acquires the impedance at a predetermined frequency, and calculates the values of the real axis and the imaginary axis on the complex plane.

As the impedance characteristic, the value of the real axis and the imaginary axis of the impedance at a predetermined frequency f1 and the absolute value calculated from the value of the real axis and the value of the imaginary axis can be used. In addition to the above-mentioned, the declination calculated from the value of the real axis and the value of the imaginary axis at the predetermined frequency f1 can be used. At the predetermined frequency f1 and the predetermined frequency f2, the difference of the values of the real axis, the difference of the values of the imaginary axis, and the difference of the absolute values calculated from the difference of the values of the real axis and the difference of the values of the imaginary axis, and declination can also be used.

The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores in advance the correspondence relationship between the impedance characteristic and the total capacity. The corresponding correspondence relationship can be created by machine learning using the measurement-purpose secondary battery 2, or created based on the measured value obtained by performing an accelerated deterioration test by using the measurement-purpose secondary battery, or created by a calculation formula that logically derives the correspondence relationship between the impedance characteristic and the total capacity in a predetermined voltage by using the model of the secondary battery.

In the present embodiment 5, similarly to the embodiment 1, after the feasibility determination unit 62 determines the feasibility of the deterioration degree determination, the capacity estimation unit 64 shown in FIG. 17 estimates the total capacity of the secondary battery 2 based on the discharging voltage characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 and the impedance characteristic acquired by the impedance characteristic acquisition unit 67. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 based on the estimation result of the capacity estimation unit 64 as in the case of the embodiment 1. According to the present embodiment 5, the total capacity is estimated based on the discharging voltage characteristic and the impedance characteristic, and thus the determination accuracy can be further improved.

In the present embodiment 5, the timing at which the impedance characteristic acquisition unit 67 measures the complex impedance is set to the discharging end time T_(P1) and T_(P2) but is not limited thereto, and measurement may be performed at other timings. For example, when the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires the charging voltage characteristic as in the embodiment 3, the impedance characteristic acquisition unit 67 may perform complex impedance measurement at the charging end time T_(Q1) and T_(Q2) shown in FIG. 12 . The capacity estimation unit 64 may use, instead of the impedance characteristic, the impedance characteristic relationship value calculated based on the impedance characteristic. As the impedance characteristic relationship value, for example, the difference in the impedance characteristic acquired by the impedance characteristic acquisition unit 67 can be adopted.

According to the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 5, the battery pack includes the multiple secondary batteries having the usage history, and the battery pack can be provided in which the difference in the deterioration degree of each of the multiple secondary batteries, which is determined based on the total capacity estimated by using the battery characteristic and the impedance characteristic related to the impedance when the secondary battery is charged or discharged, is within a predetermined range. In such a battery pack, the variation in the deterioration degree of the secondary battery included in the battery pack becomes smaller, and thus the lifetime of the battery pack as a rebuilt product can be extended and the quality improvement can be attempted.

Also in the present embodiment 5, the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the battery characteristic and the impedance characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 without estimating the total capacity. The battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may acquire the absolute value of the acquired value as the battery characteristic, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree based on the corresponding absolute value. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the difference in the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. The battery pack 20 may be assembled by classifying the secondary batteries 21 to 26 into classes such that the difference between the deterioration degree and the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is within a predetermined range.

Embodiment 6

In the present embodiment 6, in addition to the configuration of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 1 , an initial voltage acquisition unit 68 is provided as shown in FIG. 18 . As shown in FIG. 19 , the initial voltage acquisition unit 68 acquires initial voltages VI1 and VI2 that are the open circuit voltages of the secondary battery 2 at the discharging start time T₀. The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores in advance the correspondence relationship among the initial voltage value, the battery characteristic, and the total capacity. The correspondence relationship can be created as in the case of the embodiment 1. Other configurations are the same as those of the embodiment 1, and the same reference numerals are given to the same configurations of the embodiment 1, and the description thereof will be omitted.

According to the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 6, the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2 is determined also in consideration of the initial voltage in addition to the battery characteristic, and thus the determination accuracy can be further improved with a simple configuration. Instead of the initial voltage, the initial voltage relationship value calculated based on the initial voltage may be used. As the initial voltage relationship value, for example, an absolute value of the initial voltage or a difference of the initial voltage acquired by the initial voltage acquisition unit 68 can be used.

According to the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 6, the battery pack 20 includes the multiple secondary batteries 21 to 26 including a recycled product, and the battery pack 20 can be provided in which the difference in the deterioration degree of each of the multiple secondary batteries 21 to 26, which is determined based on the total capacity estimated by using the battery characteristic and the initial voltage that is the open circuit voltage of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 when the acquisition of the battery characteristic is started, is within a predetermined range. In such a battery pack 20, the variation in the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 included in the battery pack 20 becomes smaller, and thus the lifetime of the battery pack 20 as a rebuilt product can be extended and the quality improvement can be attempted.

In the present embodiment 6, as in the modified embodiment of the case of the embodiment 1, the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the battery characteristic and the initial voltage acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 without estimating the total capacity. The battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may acquire the absolute value of the acquired value as the battery characteristic, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree based on the corresponding absolute value. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the difference in the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. The battery pack 20 may be assembled by classifying the secondary batteries 21 to 26 into classes such that the difference between the deterioration degree and the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is within a predetermined range.

As another modified embodiment 7, as shown in FIG. 20 , the calculation unit 6 may have an internal resistance acquisition unit 69 that acquires the internal resistance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, and the correspondence relationship memory unit 51 may store in advance the correspondence relationship among the internal resistance, the battery characteristic, and the total capacity. In the internal resistance acquisition unit 69, the internal resistance can be calculated and acquired from the measured voltage, which is the voltage value itself detected by the voltage value detection unit 31, the open circuit voltage of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, and the current flowing through the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The open circuit voltage of the secondary battery 2 can be estimated and acquired for each time by using a map showing the correspondence relationship between the residual discharge amount and the initial voltage of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. According to the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present modified embodiment 7, the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is determined also in consideration of the internal resistance in addition to the battery characteristic, and thus the determination accuracy can be further improved with a simple configuration.

Embodiment 7

The deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 7 includes a temperature detection unit 33 as shown in FIG. 21 in addition to the configuration of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 1 . In the above-described embodiment 1, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 is configured to acquire the discharging voltage characteristic based on the voltage transition of the secondary battery 2 in the predetermined voltage section Vs as the battery characteristic, but in the present embodiment 7, instead of the above-mentioned, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires the temperature characteristic based on the temperature transition of the secondary battery 2 in predetermined voltage sections VsA and VsB as the battery characteristic. Other configurations are the same as those of the embodiment 1, and the same reference numerals are given to the same configurations of the embodiment 1, and the description thereof will be omitted. The voltage section VsA is a section in which the difference in the discharging voltage characteristic is remarkable according to the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2, and the voltage section VsB is a section in which the difference in the charging voltage characteristic is remarkable according to the deterioration degree of the secondary battery 2.

In the present embodiment 7, as shown in (a) in FIG. 22 and (b) in FIG. 22 , the temperature detection unit 33 acquires the temperature of the secondary battery 2 during charging and discharging. In the present embodiment 7, as the secondary battery 2 for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, the first secondary battery 21 taken out from the battery pack 20 and the seventh secondary battery 27 taken out from another battery pack are adopted.

The temperature transition of the secondary battery 2 in charging and discharging may show different behaviors depending on the measurement environment and the soak state of the secondary battery 2 when the inserted battery packs are different. In the present embodiment 7, as shown in (b) in FIG. 22 , the temperature transitions in the first secondary battery 21 and the seventh secondary battery 27 are within a measured room temperature setting range Tn, but show slightly different behaviors from each other. In the present embodiment 7, after the feasibility determination unit 62 determines that the determination of the deterioration degree is feasible, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires the temperature characteristic in discharging and the temperature characteristic in charging based on the battery temperature detected by the temperature detection unit 33 in both the predetermined voltage section VsA during discharging and the predetermined voltage section VsB during charging after the discharging. The capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the total capacity of each of the secondary batteries 21 and 27 based on both temperature characteristics, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree.

The temperature characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 can be, as in the case of calculating the discharging voltage characteristic in the case of the embodiment 1 and the case of calculating the charging voltage characteristic in the case of the embodiment 3, the differential value of the temperature change of the predetermined voltage VA and VB in the predetermined voltage sections VsA and VsB, the ratio of the temperature change between two points in the predetermined voltage sections VsA and VsB, and the ratio of the temperature change of the secondary battery 2 to the capacity change of the secondary battery 2 in the voltage sections VsA and VsB.

Also in the present embodiment 7, the same operation effect as in the case of the embodiment 1 can be obtained. In the present embodiment 7, the temperature characteristic is acquired in both discharging and charging but is not limited thereto, and only one of discharging and charging may be used.

According to the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 7, the battery pack includes the secondary battery having the usage history, and the battery pack can be provided in which the difference in the deterioration degree of each of the multiple secondary batteries, which is determined based on the total capacity estimated by using the battery characteristic including the temperature characteristic based on the temperature transition of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage sections VsA and VsB, is within a predetermined range. In such a battery pack, the variation in the deterioration degree of the secondary battery included in the battery pack becomes smaller, and thus the quality improvement of the battery pack as a rebuilt product can be attempted.

Also in the present embodiment 7, the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the temperature characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 without estimating the total capacity. The battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may acquire the absolute value of the acquired value as the temperature characteristic, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree based on the corresponding absolute value. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 may determine the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the difference in the temperature characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. The battery pack 20 may be assembled by classifying the secondary batteries 21 to 26 into classes such that the difference between the deterioration degree and the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is within a predetermined range.

In the present embodiment 7, as shown in (a) in FIG. 22 , as the temperature characteristic at the charging time, the temperature characteristic is acquired when the charging target voltage VQ is within the normal use range Vn and the predetermined voltage section VsA is within the normal use range Vn, but instead of the above-mentioned, as in a modified embodiment 8 shown in (a) in FIG. 23 , as the temperature characteristic at the charging time, the temperature characteristic may be acquired when the charging target voltage VQ exceeds the normal use range Vn and the predetermined voltage section VsB is in an area beyond the normal use range Vn. In this case, as shown in (b) in FIG. 23 , the temperature of the secondary batteries 21 and 27 easily rises, and thus the deterioration degree is easily reflected in the temperature transition. As a result, the determination accuracy can be improved. In the present modified embodiment 8, the secondary batteries 21 and 27 are charged to the charging target voltage VQ and then discharged to return the voltage of the secondary batteries 21 and 27 to the normal use range Vn.

In the modified embodiment 8, the secondary battery 2 is discharged, then charged, and then discharged again, but instead of the above-mentioned, as in a modified embodiment 9 shown in (a) in FIG. 24 and (b) in FIG. 24 , the battery may be charged first and then discharged without first discharging. In this case, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 may acquire the charging time temperature characteristic at the charging time and then acquire the discharging time temperature characteristic at the discharging time. Also in this case, the same operation effect as the operation effect of the embodiment 1 is obtained.

Embodiment 8

In the above-described embodiment 1, the capacity estimation unit 64 as the estimation unit estimates the total capacity of the secondary battery 2 based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63, but is not limited thereto, and the capacity estimation unit 64 may estimate at least one of the positive electrode capacity, the negative electrode capacity, the deviation amount of the relative relationship between the negative electrode SOC and the positive electrode SOC, the total capacity variation among the multiple cells forming the secondary batteries 21 to 26, and the battery resistance, positive electrode resistance, and negative electrode resistance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. In the embodiment 8, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates a positive electrode capacity Qc of each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the positive electrode capacity Qc. The form of the corresponding correspondence relationship and the method for creating the correspondence relationship are not particularly limited, and can be, for example, a calculation formula, a map, a graph, and a table, as in the case of the embodiment 1. The corresponding correspondence relationship can be created by machine learning using the measurement-purpose secondary battery 2, or created based on the actual measurement value obtained by performing an accelerated deterioration test by using the measurement-purpose secondary battery 2, or created by a calculation formula that logically derives the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the total capacity in a predetermined voltage section by using the model of the secondary battery 2. In the present embodiment, the correspondence relationship memory unit 51, for example, stores the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the positive electrode capacity Qc based on the prediction model shown in (a) to (c) in FIG. 25 . Other configurations are the same as in the case of the embodiment 1, and the same reference numerals as those in the case of the embodiment 1 are assigned and the description thereof will be omitted.

Next, a method for determining the deterioration degree by the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 8 will be described below. The description of the same steps as in the case of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 may be omitted by using the same reference numerals.

First, in the present embodiment 8, the steps S1 to S5 shown in FIG. 26 are performed as in the case of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 . Accordingly, as shown in (a) in FIG. 27 , the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires a discharging curve as the battery characteristic of each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 in the predetermined voltage section Vs. The predetermined voltage section can be a section corresponding to a specific SOC range.

Next, in a step S74 shown in FIG. 26 , the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the positive electrode capacity Qc of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 from the discharging curve acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 based on the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the positive electrode capacity Qc based on the prediction model stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51. Thereafter, in the step S8 shown in FIG. 26 , the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the positive electrode capacity Qc estimated by the capacity estimation unit 64. As in the case of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 , after the steps S9 and S10 shown in FIG. 26 are performed, in a step S110, the charging and discharging control unit 71 charges and discharges the secondary battery of which the deterioration degree is not determined, and the measured value of the positive electrode capacity is measured. As in the case of the embodiment 1, in the step S12, the feasibility determination reference and the deterioration degree determination reference are updated.

The present embodiment 8 also has the same operation effect as the operation effect of the embodiment 1. In the present embodiment 8, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires the discharging curve shown in (a) in FIG. 27 , but instead of the above-mentioned, may acquire the charging curve shown in (b) in FIG. 27 . Also in this case, the same operation effect as the operation effect of the embodiment 1 is obtained.

Embodiment 9

In the embodiment 8, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the positive electrode capacity Qc, but instead of the above-mentioned, in the embodiment 9, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the negative electrode capacity QA. That is, in the embodiment 9, as shown in FIG. 28 , in step S75 and step S111, based on the prediction model shown in (a) to (c) in FIG. 25 , the negative electrode capacity QA of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is estimated based on the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the negative electrode capacity QA. The embodiment 9 also has the same operation effect as the operation effect of the embodiment 1.

Embodiment 10

In the present embodiment 10, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the deviation amount of the relative relationship between the negative electrode SOC and the positive electrode SOC of each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the deviation amount of in the relative relationship between the negative electrode SOC and the positive electrode SOC. The form of the corresponding correspondence relationship and the method for creating the correspondence relationship are not particularly limited, and can be as in the case of the embodiment 1.

For example, when the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are made of nickel-metal hydride batteries, as shown in FIG. 29 , when hydrogen escapes from the reaction system in the battery container, the relative relationship between the negative electrode SOC and the positive electrode SOC deviates, and the OCV curve of the negative electrode deviates to the right side of the figure. For example, when the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are configured with lithium ion batteries, as shown in FIG. 29 , the lithium in the electrolytic solution is consumed in the formation of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film, such that the relative relationship between the negative electrode SOC and the positive electrode SOC deviates, and thus the OCV curve of the negative electrode deviates to the right side of the figure.

In the present embodiment 10, based on the prediction model shown in FIG. 29 , the correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores the correspondence relationship between a deviation amount Qx of the relative relationship between the negative electrode SOC and the positive electrode SOC, and the battery characteristic. Other configurations are the same as in the case of the embodiment 1, and the same reference numerals as those in the case of the embodiment 1 are assigned and the description thereof will be omitted.

A method for determining the deterioration degree by the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 10 is performed as in the case of the above-mentioned embodiment 8, but as shown in FIG. 30 , in the step S3, the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires, as the battery characteristic, a discharging curve of the predetermined voltage section Vs corresponding to a low SOC range as the battery. Thereafter, as in the case of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 , the step S4 to the step S5 shown in FIG. 30 are performed. Thereafter, the process proceeds to a step S76, and based on the battery characteristic calculated from the corresponding discharging curve, the deviation amount Qx of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 is estimated based on the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic, and the deviation amount Qx of the relative relationship between the negative electrode SOC and the positive electrode SOC stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51. Thereafter, in the step S5 shown in FIG. 30 , the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the deviation amount Qx estimated by the capacity estimation unit 64. The present embodiment 10 also has the same operation effect as the operation effect of the embodiment 1. In the present embodiment 10, the battery characteristic is acquired from a low SOC range as the battery, but instead of the above-mentioned, may be acquired from a high SOC range. In the present embodiment 10, the discharging curve is acquired as the battery characteristic, but the charging curve may be acquired.

Embodiment 11

In the present embodiment 11, the correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic, and the amount of change of the discharging capacity in the charging and discharging curve for each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the amount of change of the discharging capacity in the charging and discharging curve in the predetermined voltage section Vs, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 detects whether the self-discharge amount of the cell increases based on the estimation result as the deterioration degree. In the present embodiment 11, other configurations are the same as in the case of the embodiment 1, and the same reference numerals as those in the case of the embodiment 1 are assigned and the description thereof will be omitted.

In the present embodiment 11, each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 has six cells. For example, the discharging curve shown in (a) in FIG. 31 is stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51 as a discharging curve showing an initial state, and the discharging curve shown in (b) in FIG. 31 is stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51 as a discharging curve indicating that one of the cells has an increasing self-discharge amount. When the discharging curve shown in (a) in FIG. 31 is estimated by the capacity estimation unit 64 based on the battery characteristic of the predetermined voltage section Vs, the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines that there is no cell having the increasing self-discharge amount. When the discharging curve shown in (b) in FIG. 31 is estimated by the capacity estimation unit 64 based on the battery characteristic of the predetermined voltage section Vs, the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines that there is a cell having the increasing self-discharge amount. When the discharging curve shown in (b) in FIG. 31 is estimated, the use lower limit can be set to a second use lower limit Vmin2 that is a value higher than a first use lower limit Vmin1 that is for a case where there is no cell having an increasing self-discharge amount in the secondary battery. Accordingly, each cell can be prevented from being excessively discharged.

Embodiment 12

In the present embodiment 12, each of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 includes six cells. The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores the correspondence relationship between the total capacity variation between the cells in one of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 and the battery characteristic. The total capacity variation between the cells indicates the degree of variation in the total capacity of each cell in multiple cells included in one of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. In the present embodiment 12, as the total capacity variation between the cells, as shown in FIG. 32 , a difference Qmax-min obtained by subtracting a minimum Qmin from a maximum Qmax in the total capacity of the multiple cells is adopted. Other configurations are the same as in the case of the embodiment 1, and the same reference numerals as those in the case of the embodiment 1 are assigned and the description thereof will be omitted.

In the present embodiment 12, the capacity estimation unit 64 estimates the difference Qmax-min from the correspondence relationship stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51 based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 detects the presence or absence of specific capacity deterioration of the cell based on the estimated difference Qmax-min. For example, when the estimated difference Qmax-min is determined to be equal to or greater than a predetermined value, determination is made that specific capacity deterioration occurs in one of the cells of the corresponding secondary batteries 21 to 26.

Embodiment 13

As shown in FIG. 33 , the embodiment 13 has a resistance estimation unit 641 as an estimation unit. The resistance estimation unit 641 estimates the internal resistance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the battery characteristic of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores the correspondence relationship between the internal resistance and the battery characteristic of one of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 can acquire the battery characteristic by performing pulse charging and discharging in a state of stack in which the secondary batteries 21 to 26 are connected to each other. The voltage section for acquiring the battery characteristic can be a predetermined voltage section corresponding to a specific SOC range.

When the temperature and SOC are different between the secondary batteries 21 to 26, the temperature and the voltage change during charging and discharging or the voltage change during the voltage relaxation after charging and discharging are acquired as the battery characteristic, and the resistance value can be estimated when the temperature and SOC are the same conditions. In this case, the correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores the correspondence relationship between the internal resistance, the temperature, and the battery characteristic of one of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. The secondary batteries 21 to 26 may be individually charged and discharged to acquire the battery characteristic. In this case, it is not necessary to adjust the temperature and SOC to the same conditions, and the determination time can be shortened.

Next, a method for determining the deterioration degree by the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 13 will be described below. First, in the present embodiment 13, the steps S1 to S5 shown in FIG. 34 are performed as in the case of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 . Next, in a step S77 shown in FIG. 34 , the resistance estimation unit 641 acquires the internal resistance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 from the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63, based on the correspondence relationship between the battery characteristic and the internal resistance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51. Thereafter, in the step S8 shown in FIG. 34 , the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the internal resistance estimated by the resistance estimation unit 641. As in the case of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 , after the steps S9 and S10 shown in FIG. 34 are performed, in a step S113, the charging and discharging control unit 71 charges and discharges the secondary battery of which the deterioration degree is not determined, and the measured value of the internal resistance is measured. As in the case of the embodiment 1, in the step S12, the feasibility determination reference and the deterioration degree determination reference are updated. The present embodiment 13 also has the same operation effect as the operation effect of the embodiment 1.

Embodiment 14

In the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the embodiment 14, the resistance estimation unit 641 estimates the negative electrode resistance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26.

From the frequency characteristic in the voltage curve of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, the resistance value of the positive electrode, the negative electrode, and other battery elements in the secondary batteries 21 to 26 can be calculated. In nickel-metal hydride batteries and lithium ion batteries, the negative electrode resistance is remarkably reflected in the high frequency region in the voltage curve, and the positive electrode resistance is remarkably reflected in the low frequency region. In the present embodiment 14, nickel-metal hydride batteries are used as the secondary batteries 21 to 26, and the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires a voltage curve in a predetermined voltage section in a high frequency region as the battery characteristic. The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores in advance the correspondence relationship between the voltage curve in the high frequency region as the battery characteristic and the negative electrode resistance. The other configuration elements are the same as in the case of the embodiment 13, and the same reference numerals are given and the description thereof will be omitted.

In the internal resistance having a correlation with the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, the dominant resistance element differs depending on the deterioration mode. First, the internal resistance of the secondary battery module is determined by the relationship among the three resistance components of electronic resistance, reaction resistance, and internal material transfer resistance, and the secondary battery module can be considered to be a series equivalent circuit of the three resistance components. In general, the electronic resistance is a resistance component mainly generated in the time region immediately after a constant current is applied to a battery. The reaction resistance is a resistance component mainly generated in the time region after the time region in which the electronic resistance is generated. The internal material transfer resistance is generated when a constant current is applied for a long time, and is a resistance component mainly generated in the time region after the time region of the reaction resistance. The negative electrode reaction resistance dominant area is a temporal area in which the ratio of the reaction resistance of the negative electrode in a discharging period among the above three resistance components is the largest. In the corresponding negative electrode reaction resistance dominant area, the reaction resistance of the negative electrode predominantly determines the internal resistance of the secondary battery 2. In the present embodiment 14, the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the negative electrode resistance estimated by the resistance estimation unit 641 in the corresponding negative electrode reaction resistance dominant area.

In a method for determining the deterioration degree by the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 14, the steps S1 to S5 shown in FIG. 34 are performed as in the case of the embodiment 13. In the step S77, the resistance estimation unit 641 estimates the negative electrode resistance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the voltage curve acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 and the correspondence relationship stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 from the estimated negative electrode resistance. As in the case of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 , after the steps S9 and S10 shown in FIG. 34 are performed, in the step S113, the charging and discharging control unit 71 charges and discharges the secondary battery of which the deterioration degree is not determined, and the measured value of the negative electrode resistance is measured. As in the case of the embodiment 1, in the step S12, the feasibility determination reference and the deterioration degree determination reference are updated. The present embodiment 14 also has the same operation effect as the operation effect of the embodiment 1.

Embodiment 15

In the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the embodiment 15, the resistance estimation unit 641 estimates the positive electrode resistance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26, and the deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26. In the present embodiment 15, nickel-metal hydride batteries are used as the secondary batteries 21 to 26, and the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 acquires a voltage curve in a predetermined voltage section in a low frequency region as the battery characteristic. The correspondence relationship memory unit 51 stores in advance the correspondence relationship between the voltage curve as the battery characteristic and the positive electrode resistance. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the positive electrode resistance estimated by the resistance estimation unit 641 in the positive electrode reaction resistance dominant area. The other configuration elements are the same as in the case of the embodiment 14, and the same reference numerals are given and the description thereof will be omitted.

In a method for determining the deterioration degree by the deterioration degree determination device 1 of the present embodiment 15, the steps S1 to S5 shown in FIG. 34 are performed as in the case of the embodiment 14. In the step S77, the resistance estimation unit 641 estimates the positive electrode resistance of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 based on the voltage curve acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit 63 and the correspondence relationship stored in the correspondence relationship memory unit 51. The deterioration degree determination unit 65 determines the deterioration degree of the secondary batteries 21 to 26 from the estimated positive electrode resistance. As in the case of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 , after the steps S9 and S10 shown in FIG. 34 are performed, in the step S113, the charging and discharging control unit 71 charges and discharges the secondary battery of which the deterioration degree is not determined, and the measured value of the positive electrode resistance is measured. As in the case of the embodiment 1, in the step S12, the feasibility determination reference and the deterioration degree determination reference are updated. The present embodiment 15 also has the same operation effect as the operation effect of the embodiment 1.

The present disclosure is not limited to each of the above embodiments, and can be applied to various embodiments without departing from the gist thereof.

Although the present disclosure has been described in accordance with the embodiments, it is understood that the present disclosure is not limited to such embodiments or structures. The present disclosure also includes various modified embodiments and a modification within an equivalent scope. Various combinations or forms as well as other combinations or forms including only one element, one or more elements, or one or fewer elements, fall within the scope or the spirit of the present disclosure.

The deterioration degree determination device 1 and the method described in the present disclosure may be implemented by a special purpose computer, which includes a memory and a processor programmed to execute one or more special functions implemented by computer programs of the memory. Alternatively, the deterioration degree determination device 1 and the method described in the present disclosure may be implemented by a dedicated computer configured as a processor with one or more dedicated hardware logic circuits. Alternatively, the deterioration degree determination device 1 and the method thereof described in the present disclosure may be implemented by one or more dedicated computers configured by a combination of a processor and a memory programmed to execute one or multiple functions and a processor configured by one or more hardware logic circuits. The computer program may also be stored in a computer readable non-transitory tangible storage medium as computer executable instructions. The deterioration degree determination device 1 and the method thereof described in the present disclosure do not necessarily need to include software, and all the functions may be implemented using one or more hardware circuits.

Multiple functions of one configuration element in the above embodiments may be implemented by multiple configuration elements, or a single function of one configuration element may be implemented by multiple configuration elements. Multiple functions of multiple configuration elements in the above embodiments may be implemented by one configuration element, or one function implemented by multiple configuration elements may be implemented by one configuration element. A part of the configurations of the above embodiments may be omitted as appropriate. At least a part of the configuration in one embodiment may be added to or substituted for the configuration of another embodiment.

In addition to the above deterioration degree determination device 1, the present disclosure can also be implemented in various forms, such as a system including the deterioration degree determination device 1 as an element, a program that controls a computer to function as deterioration degree determination device 1, a non-transitory tangible storage medium, such as a semiconductor memory in which the above-described program is recorded, and a deterioration degree determination method. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery, configured to determine a deterioration degree of the secondary battery, the deterioration degree determination device comprising: a battery information acquisition unit that acquires battery information related to the secondary battery; a feasibility determination unit that determines feasibility of determination of the deterioration degree for each secondary battery based on the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit and a feasibility determination reference prepared in advance; a battery characteristic acquisition unit that acquires a battery characteristic related to transition of a battery state in a predetermined voltage section for the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible by the feasibility determination unit; and a deterioration degree determination unit that determines the deterioration degree of the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit or a battery characteristic relationship value calculated based on the battery characteristic, wherein the battery characteristic includes a discharging voltage characteristic based on at least one of a voltage transition when the secondary battery is discharged to a discharging target voltage and a voltage transition after discharging of the secondary battery to the discharging target voltage is stopped, and the voltage transition is calculated based on at least one of a section capacity of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, a ratio of a voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to a capacity change of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, a ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to an elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section, and a capacity ratio of the section capacity in the voltage section with respect to a total discharging capacity when discharged to the discharging target voltage.
 2. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein the voltage transition is calculated based on at least two of the section capacity of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to the capacity change of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to the elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section, and the capacity ratio of the section capacity in the voltage section with respect to the total discharging capacity when discharged to the discharging target voltage.
 3. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein the battery information includes at least one of the battery characteristic and history information of the secondary battery.
 4. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein the battery information includes both the battery characteristic and history information of the secondary battery.
 5. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein the feasibility determination unit performs determination of the feasibility based on a comparison result between a battery information relationship value calculated from the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit and the feasibility determination reference, by using a preset relational expression related to a plurality of battery information.
 6. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 5, wherein the feasibility determination unit uses a distance between data calculated based on two or more battery information acquired in advance as the feasibility determination reference.
 7. A deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery, configured to determine a deterioration degree of the secondary battery, the deterioration degree determination device comprising: a battery information acquisition unit that acquires battery information related to the secondary battery; a feasibility determination unit that determines feasibility of determination of the deterioration degree for each secondary battery based on the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit and a feasibility determination reference prepared in advance; a battery characteristic acquisition unit that acquires a battery characteristic related to transition of a battery state in a predetermined voltage section for the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible by the feasibility determination unit; and a deterioration degree determination unit that determines the deterioration degree of the secondary battery for which the determination of the deterioration degree is determined to be feasible, based on the battery characteristic acquired by the battery characteristic acquisition unit or a battery characteristic relationship value calculated based on the battery characteristic, wherein the battery characteristic includes a charging voltage characteristic based on at least one of a voltage transition when the secondary battery is charged to a charging target voltage and a voltage transition after charging of the secondary battery to the charging target voltage is stopped, and the voltage transition is calculated based on at least one of a section capacity of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, a ratio of a voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to a capacity change of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, a ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to an elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section, and a capacity ratio of the section capacity in the voltage section with respect to a total charging capacity when charged to the charging target voltage.
 8. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 7, wherein the voltage transition is calculated based on at least two of the section capacity of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to the capacity change of the secondary battery in the predetermined voltage section, the ratio of the voltage change of the secondary battery with respect to the elapsed time in the predetermined voltage section, and the capacity ratio of the section capacity in the voltage section with respect to the total charging capacity when charged to the charging target voltage.
 9. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 7, wherein the battery information includes at least one of the battery characteristic and history information of the secondary battery.
 10. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 7, wherein the battery information includes both the battery characteristic and history information of the secondary battery.
 11. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 7, wherein the feasibility determination unit performs determination of the feasibility based on a comparison result between a battery information relationship value calculated from the battery information acquired by the battery information acquisition unit and the feasibility determination reference, by using a preset relational expression related to a plurality of battery information.
 12. The deterioration degree determination device for a secondary battery according to claim 11, wherein the feasibility determination unit uses a distance between data calculated based on two or more battery information acquired in advance as the feasibility determination reference. 